FindArena > Find Arena > Attorney

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 ()
Rfdsezlft : Ok, so I have an iPhone 4 & my brother gave me his old iPhone 3GS so I decided to give it to my hubby since he's been wanting an iPhone but he's already got a phone so he was just going to use the old iphone to listen to music & what not. just like an ipod. Well, I restored the phone on my laptop & it updated it to firmware 4.2.1 (my iphone is jailbroken & they haven't came out with a new jailbreak so i didnt download the new apple update) anyways, the restoration was succesful but a message pops up on the phone & says no sim & it wont let me slide to unlock it, when it does it just says emergency calls only! Sooo what can i do??

  Reply With Quote
  #2 ()
Loasiarog :
  Reply With Quote
more..
  #3 ()
reteAmeli : You can certainly ask

ensure they are aila members
  Reply With Quote
  #4 ()
upsellweast : You can always fire an attorney, pay all balances due, and hire another attorney.
  Reply With Quote
  #5 ()
poenceRaipleKip : The SC only shot down one part of the Voting Rights Act, not all sections of it.

So Holder is expected to announce that the Justice Department is using other sections of the Voting Rights Act to bring lawsuits or take other legal action to prevent states from implementing certain laws, including requirements to present certain kinds of identification in order to vote.
  Reply With Quote
  #6 ()
uncentre : Obama has declared himself the do over king of America.
  Reply With Quote
  #7 ()
Jeojeryceby : The SCOTUS decision only said the formula that Congress used to decide which areas needed DOJ scrutiny was flawed. It did not say the redistricting plan in Texas was ok. The decision also only blocks the DOJ from restricting Texas, or any other area, from changing their voting procedures. It doesn't block other Federal Courts from doing so.

Federal Courts are a different branch of government than the DOJ.
  Reply With Quote
  #8 ()
tireargueme : ok... just by looking at your link... it says "opens up new front"...

I would bet that they are attacking it on another legal basis... you know... something can be illegal for more than one reason...
  Reply With Quote
  #9 ()
Exerierok : Because often there is more than one legal avenue open when bringing suit in court. The state can still be acting in a way that violates a federal law that is separate from the voting rights act. Pursuing the case in that way is not ignoring the SCOTUS ruling because the ruling is irrelevant. The DOJ has lots of tools in its legal tool belt. The voting rights act might have been the best one to use in the past, but that doesn't mean that there aren't other tools that can still get the job done.
  Reply With Quote
  #10 ()
Paisymomtoori : Gotta give you credit for trying to pull the wool over people's eyes - SCOTUS didn't do any such thing. That's why Obama is challenging the laws - they're dip ch!* - trying to suppress mionoritie's votes.
  Reply With Quote